This morning I had a Skype call with the founders of Hyperink, a publishing startup based in San Francisco. They recently raised $1.2 million from Andreessen Horowitz, Y Combinator and SV Angel, making them at least 4 million in valuation.
We met — as many in the valley do — via a mutual friend. I had helped a guy named Derrick Kho set up an internship program called Startup Roots earlier this year, when he contacted the NUS Hackers for publicity and introductions to good student programmers. When I went to the valley I stayed with a bunch of NUS students, one of which turned out to be his girlfriend.
"Have you heard of Hyperink?" he asked on my first night there, propped up in the cold on the doorstep outside.
I had, but I didn't really knew what they did. Derrick told me. "Maybe I can set up an email introduction — I think you guys should really meet."
We did, and I spent Saturday morning talking to Kevin, one of the co-founders, and then programming at the Hyperink offices.
When I got back to Singapore, Kevin set up a Skype call because (it turned out) they wanted my advice on setting up a digital publishing workflow. (By chance, I'd spent most of my time at Pandamian doing something similar). I obliged by pointing them to half-a-dozen tools, including an EPUB generator I adapted for Pandamian and then maintained, as free and open source software. In exchange, they were willing to give us access to their authors to test out a marketing tool we were planning to build.
"Thanks for your help," said Matt, the other co-founder, shortly before we concluded. "When Kevin first told me about you, he said 'holy shit I met this guy and he knows so much about ebooks.' And that turned out to be totally true, and then some!"
I felt pleased at that, but then the Skype call ended and I was faced with an incomplete assignment, and I felt bad again.
Here's my problem: I find it hard to reconcile my status as a student with my status as an ebook 'person'.
I am a terrible student: right now I'm doing level 2 modules in NUS when I'm third year, and my classmates look at me a little funny when I tell them, slightly embarrassed, what mods I'm currently studying for. Sometimes I change the subject, because I don't want to see the looks on their faces when they find out.
On the other hand, they're not sure how to react when I tell them what I do on the side. I also don't tell many of them about my extra-curricular activities.
I'm not sure how to judge my self-worth. My pride at my ebook work (and my obsession with some of the problems in the field) are mostly buried under my insecurities as a student. I'm not disciplined in studying, I get distracted, I fail subjects. I'm at least half a year behind on my peers, and I'm likely to repeat a semester, delaying graduation for half a year.
And on the side, I'm giving advice (and code) to a million-dollar company.
How do I reconcile this? I know I should feel proud, but right now I'm struggling with constructing a processor out of logic gates, and doing badly at it. I suppose there's only so many Cs and Ds one can take before thinking badly of oneself (okay, I know I'm not an idiot, but there's psychological wear and tear, just try it for a year or two).
(And, yes, some people would say this immunization to failure is necessary for an entrepreneur).
I suppose my insecurities about my academics has tempered with my obsession (and pride) with doing good work in digital publishing. Maybe that's a good thing.
Maybe not.
On the bright side, at least I know if I fail I can always get a job as an ebook consultant.
Haha, now wouldn't that be a laugh?
Wednesday, November 09, 2011
Paradox
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
Well you do have something that not many people have. I would say don't be embarrassed with you academics, but I think it's more important that you know that your academics and your ECAs needn't be mutually exclusive.
Thanks, Nick. :) That does make me feel better. A little.
i suspect that your academic insecurities come from the subconscious idea that academic standards are society's way to measure your success (at this stage) - its natural because it's probably the only quantifiable way to measure success. this changes when you leave uni and then the measure of success would be how big your bank account is - its only the next most quantifiable thing (now that grades dont apply).
so if we were to take the statement 'academic results are a measure of how successful you are in life', we would find ourselves disagreeing with it completely. we know life isn't all that.
its probably as simple as that. its probably not so much as trying to reconcile the academics and your side things but more of accepting that academics just isnt your forte and your side thing is.
at least you know you put in your best, right? :)
I'm of the opinion that it doesn't matter what the context of academic success is. If you care about it and want it badly, then do something about it, for its own sake and for your own enjoyment (your own philosophy, slightly tweaked). It could just be a matter of approach. Don't be defeatist about it, unless of course, you truly do not care.
As for nitty gritty "how do I go about these big concepts", it seems to me that you're isolating yourself from your friends. Don't. If they're above you academically, then they can give you a boost. If they're not sure how to respond, guide them.
Thanks again, both of you. I'll take your advice on approaching my friends, Nick. And @Anon: that's the problem, I think - I don't do my best. I keep getting distracted. But thank you for sussing things out, regardless. :)
Post a Comment